Misandry Review - Latest Comments

Re: New Jersey law requires $25 of $28 for a marriage license to go to battered women’s shelters

Eric Bruno — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 09:36:59 -0000

You don't understand. This has nothing to do with being a sexiest law. I will put any amount of money that the fund is being raided by corrupt politicians to put into the coffers and line the pockets of any business or corporation or other politician looking to play ball and get other corrupt politicians elected.
It's how it works in NJ.

Re: We’re all slavering sex perverts/paedophiles - according to Microsoft

Porky — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:42:46 -0000

Great, not only are they greedy bastards who cant make a decent OS, but they have a low opinion of my sex as well!

Re: ‘Women actually do need men — real men, that is’

Mark — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:11:11 -0000

Amen,man.

Preach on,Brother Porky.

Re: Infanticide Case Mesmerizes France

Gaurav11 — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:48:08 -0000

Yes, what she did could be qualified as cruel or some other adjective. But first, what I would like to understand is why this woman went ahead with her pregnancies, what she believed in, what her hopes were

Re: Maid lodges false case of rape, theft

Gaurav11 — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:05:59 -0000

To cover up a theft, and a pregnancy that likely would be frowned upon, this young woman falsely claimed rape. And she was only let off with a reprimand.

Re: ‘Women actually do need men — real men, that is’

Porky — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:16:38 -0000

I dont need anyone, much less a woman, telling me what a real man is.

Re: “Dana Perino: Only Male Politicians Commit Adultery”

Jose Ferreira — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:39:38 -0000

It is statistically impossible that female politicians don't commit adultery. It is quite possible, on the other habd, that the media don't dare report it when they do.

Re: Court Rules for White Firefighters Over Promotions

Porky — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:09:52 -0000

In your face Sotomayor! And up yours Bader Ginsburg.

Re: Wrongful prosecution lawsuit dismissed

Greg D. — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:52:21 -0000

If she admitted to making it up then why did she get off? What a stupid jury.

Re: Massachusetts: Supreme Judicial Court sees possible bias in rape case

James Regal — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:03:37 -0000

As I read this and other related articles, the judges were not 'bitterly divided' as noted in the Boston.com article. Let's count them, three Supreme Justices sided with the boy; plus the Single Justice in a previous failed appeal by DA Cruz, plus the lower court judge on two noted appeals ruled in favor of the boy. Two Supreme Justices dissented. So five judges ruled in favor of the boy and two dissented. i.e. 70% of the judges who have reviewed the details and viewed the SAIN video interviews of the girls have ruled in favor of the boy. 70% in favor of the boy is not a bitter division! Add to that, the ALCU in Massachusetts and nationally through the New York office is siding with the boy.

The question in my mind is why is this case even in the courts wasting taxpayer money; per the SJC SLIP Opinion, the three girls admitted on video tape to the SAIN interviewer that the sexual activity/games (truth-or-dare) was consensual, all four kids were under the age of consent (16) in Massachusetts and therefore should be "protected by" not "prosecuted under" the statute; or inanely all should be charged as 'felon sex offenders'. That's a scary thought if this is the true intent of the cited statute as passed by the Massachusetts legislators. And, in my opinion, charging only the boy will clearly be a discriminatory embarrassment for DA Cruz, his staff, and the Clerk Magistrate.

In the end, again in my opinion, it is sadly the children, especially the boy, who will be emotionally scarred for life from the injustices evident in these gratuitous charges at the hands of an injudicious and discriminatory District Attorney.

Note: the boy's lawyer is a well known Boston defense attorney, so if she has seen the statistics and is 'compelled to fill a motion to dismiss' I would be willing to bet that the statistics do show that DA Cruz and his staff discriminate in these cases.

Based on the Massachusetts statute, the girl's have admitted to felony sex offenses against the minor boy in this case. They could well be charged and convicted as felony sex offenders for their statutory crimes against the boy in this case. The statute applies equally and does not discriminate between boys and girls.

Why would the mothers of these three girls even go to the police to begin with, this is clearly a family matter to parent the children, not prosecute. The father of the boy tried to do the right thing, and his son ends up facing multiple felony sex offender charges for playing truth-or-dare. Again, how inane!

Justice Marshall and others got this one right. The two dissenting justices are in error, the Massachusetts statute does not support age difference as justification to charge the boy and not the girls in this case. The statute is clear and not in dispute; as inane as this outcome is to rational thinking. The Massachusetts legislation needs to correct this and adopt Romeo and Juliet exceptions just as 38 other states have already enacted.

Re: AMFORTAS PODCASTS AND VIDEOS TO SHARE #1

Porky — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:44:32 -0000

These are excellent podcasts and this little piggie highly recommends them - very informative and eloquent stuff.

Re: Mother pleads guilty to drunken breast-feeding

Gaurav11 — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:04:09 -0000

Alcohol consumed by breast-feeding mothers can be absorbed into an infant's system.???

I am not sure what this has to do with men's rights, but the story is ridiculous or it has left out a few details.

I don't condone exposing a baby to alcohol, but I would like to know if the police conducted a blood alcohol level on the baby? If not, then how do they know if a crime occurred?

Re: The Misinformation Age

Steve — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:46:11 -0000

The suggestion that HIV is not the cause of AIDS is silly because we know treatments arising from detailed use of that discovery are the only ones that get AIDS patients out of their beds and back to near-normal life.

When you advocate silly conspiracy theories, you undermine the parts of your philosophy that are valid.

Re: More reasons why I am not a MRA

fschmidt — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:04:02 -0000

I liked your "Time to move beyond MGTOW" but I don't agree with this one. Many of those people who left Europe to settle in America around 1700 held extreme views by European standards. Instead of fighting the European system, they left it. Serious MRAs should do the same today by dropping out of mainstream society and forming their own subculture. The problem with MRAs isn't their extreme views. The problem is that all they do is talk. This is why MRAs deserve no respect.

Re: Obama kicks off a national conversation on fatherhood

Porky — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:08:19 -0000

Call me cynical but i see another full frontal assault coming up.

Re: Japan panics about the rise of “grass-eating men”

Porky — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:34:21 -0000

Good news for once - at last men are starting to tell societies that mistreat them to get stuffed. I urge men everywhere to do the same - if it doesn't love you leave it.

Re: An example of what is NOT rape

Porky — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:28:51 -0000

Hyperbole and irony are words feminists only use in relation to their own hateful statements, not anyone else's, hence we know that they don not mean it when they claim such hate speech is "hyperbole".

Re: We the Sheeple

Porky — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:57:13 -0000

Clever pic but needs to be resized for this content width.Feel free to delete after reading.

Re: An example of what is NOT rape

Marissa — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:07:20 -0000

What is infinitely more disturbing than the letter from a college student written in 1998 is the people who spend their time in the present digging up these relics of the past and trying to attach the word hate to them. The point of this letter was to say that rape originates with disrespectful actions and that we must as a society temper our behavior so that the grossest permutation of disrespect is avoided. It is ironic that a site, and the person behind it, that aims to curb hatred invested so much energy in doling out hateful remarks regarding words that they clearly misunderstood. As the original letter uses hyperbole to illustrate a point, perhaps it is difficult to understand to the literal mind. The lesson here reaffirms what is so often the lesson when it comes to unfounded hate: that it is more accurately labeled a failure, in effort or effect, in understanding.

Re: On the Letterman-Palin flap; the real outrage should be that A-Rod was jokingly accused of rape

Porky — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:57:41 -0000

Hey, A- Rod doesnt matter, he's a man after all.

Re: ‘Celebrate National Man Day?’

Porky — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:25:58 -0000

These guys are idiots.

Re: ‘Woman to woman: Do we need male advocacy groups?’

Porky — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:21:17 -0000

Feminists are stoopid - throw rocks at them.

Re: Letterman is wrong, and so is Palin

Porky — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:30:03 -0000

She's full of crap - if Letterman were a Republican she would have ignored it, plain and simple.

Re: Out-of-work bachelors struggle in dating game

Porky — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:47:05 -0000

This is not a problem - less dating equals less marriage and this is good for men.

Re: Write to Your Congressman

david_black — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:47:48 -0000

All people are equal. Both genders !
Dr.David Black
www.blackchiropractic.com.au